CECIL v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
| ROSE CECIL |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. and COSMETIC, TOILETRY, AND FRAGRANCE ASSOCIATION |
| 1:2018cv01788 |
| July 31, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 11001 |
| Rudolph Contreras |
| Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case transferred to the USDC for the District of New Jersey, pursuant to Court Order entered 9/25/2018; Sent to Court via extraction. (ztnr) |
| Filing 11 EMAIL from the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey requesting the transfer of the original file to be sent using the extract civil case feature of CM/ECF. (ztnr) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFIED COPY OF CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-107) dated 9/25/2018 from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation directing the transfer to the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Honorable Freda L. Wolfson for coordinated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407.(MDL 2738) (ztnr) |
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.. (Coots, John) |
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by JOHNSON & JOHNSON. (Coots, John) |
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION to Stay by JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Coots Declaration, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Coots, John) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC..(Coots, John) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction And Improper Venue by JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Elberg Affidavit, #2 Exhibit Son Affidavit, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Coots, John) |
MINUTE ORDER granting #7 Defendants' Unopposed Motion to Stay All Proceedings: It is hereby ORDERED that this case is STAYED until further action from the Court or transfer by the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. The parties are relieved of any pleading, discovery, or other obligation until further notice. It is FURTHER ORDERED that this case is administratively closed pending a ruling on such transfer. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on August 30, 2018. (lcrc2)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas Tobias Locke on behalf of PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL (Locke, Thomas) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zsb) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by ROSE CECIL. Case related to Case No. 1:18-cv-1510 and MDL No. 3:16-md-2738. (Parfitt, Michelle) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-5612588) filed by ROSE CECIL. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Johnson & Johnson, #3 Summons Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc., #4 Summons Personal Care Products Council)(Parfitt, Michelle) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Rudolph Contreras. (zsb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
