HUMMER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
| LESTER L. HUMMER |
| DAN RATTRAY and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 1:2018cv01816 |
| August 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 88888 |
| Timothy J Kelly |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by William Mark Nebeker on behalf of DAN RATTRAY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (Nebeker, William)
|
|
Filing 2
RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 8/6/2018. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 10/5/2018.) RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 8/6/2018. RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. DAN RATTRAY served on 8/6/2018 (ztth)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against DAN RATTRAY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 4616093932) filed by LESTER L. HUMMER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1 - 24, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (tth)
|
|
SUMMONS (3) Issued as to DAN RATTRAY, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (tth)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
