LEE v. NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR ASSOCIATION et al
ROBERT LEE |
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL, J.E. RICHARDS ELECTRICAL, I.B.E.W., LOCAL UNION #26 and NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR ASSOCIATION |
1:2018cv01832 |
August 3, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Washington, DC Office |
11001 |
Unassigned |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Ordered that the application of the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. This is a final appealable Order. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 8/13/18. (zsth) |
Filing 3 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 8/13/18. (zsth) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ROBERT LEE. (zmd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against I.B.E.W., LOCAL UNION #26, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL, J.E. RICHARDS ELECTRICAL, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR ASSOCIATION with Jury Demand filed by ROBERT LEE. (Attachments: #1 Additional Documents to Complaint) (zmd) |
Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 8/3/2018. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zmd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.