HEARD v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
| ROBERT HEARD |
| GAINESVILLE, GA, MEXICANS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and MUSLIMS |
| 1:2018cv01848 |
| July 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Reconsideration re #4 Order Dismissing Pro Se Case, #3 Memorandum & Opinion by ROBERT HEARD (zsb) |
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Ordered that the application of the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. This is a final appealable Order. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 08/16/2018. (zsb)
|
| Filing 3 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 08/16/2018. (zsb) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ROBERT HEARD (zsb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GAINESVILLE, GA, MEXICANS, MUSLIMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE filed by ROBERT HEARD. (Portions of document illegible)(zsb) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 07/27/2018. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zsb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
