HOTZENDORF v. TAYLOR et al
| CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY and District Director SARAH TAYLOR |
| Ricardo Conrad Hotzendorf |
| JEFF SESSIONS, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN and SARAH TAYLOR |
| 1:2018cv01895 |
| August 14, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 11001 |
| Trevor N McFadden |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1451 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS (5) Issued Electronically as to KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, JEFF SESSIONS, SARAH TAYLOR, CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, U.S. Attorney (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent) (zmd) |
Filing 2
STANDING ORDER Establishing Procedures for Cases Before Judge Trevor N. McFadden. The parties are hereby ORDERED to read and comply with the directives in the attached standing order. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 8/16/2018. (lctnm2)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Trevor N. McFadden. (zmd) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, JEFF SESSIONS, SARAH TAYLOR, CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-5637412) filed by Ricardo Conrad Hotzendorf. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, 2, 3, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons DHS, #4 Summons FBI, #5 Summons AG, #6 Summons USCIS)(Krop, Sebastian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
