HURT al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
GEORGE A. ALEXANDER and Dorene Hurt |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
1:2018cv01937 |
August 17, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Washington, DC Office |
88888 |
Amy Berman Jackson |
Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 9/4/2018. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 11/3/2018. (Masciola, Peter) |
Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 9/4/2018. (Masciola, Peter) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS (2) Issued Electronically as to UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent) (zmd) |
Filing 2 ERRATA by GEORGE A. ALEXANDER, DORENE HURT #1 Complaint, filed by GEORGE A. ALEXANDER, DORENE HURT. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Masciola, Peter) |
Case Assigned to Judge Amy Berman Jackson. (zmd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-5646202) filed by GEORGE A. ALEXANDER, DORENE HURT. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(Masciola, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.