RASSA v. AMTRAK
| JOSEPH D. RASSA |
| AMTRAK and AMTRAK doing business as NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION |
| 1:2018cv02024 |
| August 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Timothy J Kelly |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #6 Amended Complaint by AMTRAK.(Davis, Alison) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE re #4 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by JOSEPH D. RASSA. (Dhali, Arinderjit) |
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against AMTRAK with Jury Demand filed by JOSEPH D. RASSA.(Dhali, Arinderjit) |
| Filing 5 Receipt on 9/24/2018 of ORIGINAL FILE, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet from Superior Court. Superior Court Number 18ca4957. (zrdj) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by AMTRAK (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Davis, Alison) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Counsel re #1 Notice of Removal. (zmd) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Timothy J. Kelly. (zmd) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by AMTRAK. (Davis, Alison) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from DC Superior Court, case number 2018CA004957B Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0090-5663610 filed by AMTRAK. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Notice to Counsel/Party, #3 Notice of Filing Removal, #4 Superior Court Documents)(Davis, Alison) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
