SEDOV v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
| STANISLAV SEDOV |
| U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES, CHRISTOPHER WRAY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, JAMES WYROUGH, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN, L. FRANCIS CISSNA and JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III |
| 1:2018cv02066 |
| September 1, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Randolph D Moss |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS (8) Issued Electronically as to L. FRANCIS CISSNA, KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CHRISTOPHER WRAY, JAMES WYROUGH, U.S. Attorney. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent) (zmd) |
Filing 2
STANDING ORDER: The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives set forth in the attached Standing Order. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 9/4/2018. (lcrdm2, )
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Randolph D. Moss. (zmd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-5669076) filed by STANISLAV SEDOV. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Summons)(Hacking, James) (Attachment 1 replaced on 9/10/2018) (znmw). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
