SELTZ v. CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD, INC.

Plaintiff: RYAN SELTZ
Defendant: CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD, INC.
Case Number: 1:2018cv02092
Filed: September 6, 2018
Court: District Of Columbia District Court
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29:201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed#Document Text
September 6, 2018 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Margaret Inomata on behalf of CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD, INC. (Inomata, Margaret)
September 6, 2018 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD, INC.. (Inomata, Margaret)
September 6, 2018 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court for the District of Columbia, case number 2018 CA 004710 B Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0090-5675578 filed by CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Inomata, Margaret)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SELTZ v. CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RYAN SELTZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD, INC.
Represented By: Margaret Inomata
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?