JAMES MADISON PROJECT v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Plaintiff: THE JAMES MADISON PROJECT and JAMES MADISON PROJECT
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Case Number: 1:2018cv02152
Filed: September 18, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Christopher R Cooper
Nature of Suit: Freedom of Information Act
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 24, 2018 Set/Reset Deadlines: Responses due by 11/26/2018. (znbn)
October 24, 2018 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER granting #7 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant shall file its response to the complaint by November 26, 2018. Signed by Judge Christopher R. Cooper on 10/24/2018. (lccrc1)
October 22, 2018 Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint by DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Peterson, Benton) Modified relief on 10/23/2018 (ztd).
October 11, 2018 Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 9/24/2018. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 10/24/2018. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit USADC receipt)(Moss, Bradley)
October 11, 2018 Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE served on 9/24/2018 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit DoD receipt)(Moss, Bradley)
October 11, 2018 Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 09/26/18. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit USAG receipt)(Moss, Bradley)
September 19, 2018 Filing 3 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (zrdj)
September 19, 2018 Case Assigned to Judge Christopher R. Cooper. (zrdj)
September 18, 2018 Filing 2 LCvR 7.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by JAMES MADISON PROJECT (zrdj)
September 18, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-5693368) filed by THE JAMES MADISON PROJECT. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Rule 7.1 certification, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons DoD, #4 Summons USADC, #5 Summons USAG)(Moss, Bradley)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: JAMES MADISON PROJECT v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: THE JAMES MADISON PROJECT
Represented By: Bradley Prescott Moss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JAMES MADISON PROJECT
Represented By: Bradley Prescott Moss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Represented By: Benton Gregory Peterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?