SMITH v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
| NICOLE SMITH |
| WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY |
| 1:2018cv02168 |
| September 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Randolph D Moss |
| Motor Vehicle |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Set/Reset Hearings: Status Conference set for 12/7/2018 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 21 before Judge Randolph D. Moss. (dot) |
MINUTE ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall appear for a status conference on December 7, 2018 at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 21 to discuss further proceedings in this case. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 11/6/2018. (lcrdm3, )
|
| NOTICE OF CORRECTED DOCKET ENTRY: re #7 Notice of Appearance was entered in error and counsel refiled said pleading as docket entry no. #8 . (ztd) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by David Brian Ginsburg on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Ginsburg, David) |
| Filing 7 ENTERED IN ERROR. . . . .NOTICE of Appearance by David Brian Ginsburg on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Ginsburg, David) Modified on 11/6/2018 (ztd). |
| Filing 6 Receipt on 9/27/2018 of ORIGINAL FILE, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet from Superior Court. Superior Court Number 18ca5993. (zrdj) |
|
Filing 5
STANDING ORDER: The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives set forth in the attached Standing Order. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 9/21/2018. (lcrdm3, )
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Counsel re #1 Notice of Removal. (zjd) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Randolph D. Moss. (zjd) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET by WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY. Related document: #1 Notice of Removal, filed by WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY.(Phucas, Nicholas) |
| Filing 2 LCvR 7.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY. (zjd) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court for the District of Columbia, case number 2018CA005993V Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0090-5697481 filed by WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY. (Attachments: #1 Disclosure of Corporate Affiliation, #2 Answer to Complaint, #3 Notice of State Filings, #4 Proof of filing of Notice of Removal, #5 Superior Court Documents)(Phucas, Nicholas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: SMITH v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY | |
| Represented By: | Nicholas L. Phucas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: NICOLE SMITH | |
| Represented By: | David Brian Ginsburg |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
