ROSE v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Plaintiff: RICHARD W. ROSE
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Case Number: 1:2018cv02199
Filed: September 20, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Tanya S Chutkan
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petition: Mandamus & Other (Other)
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 11, 2020 Filing 34 MANDATE of USCA as to #23 Notice of Appeal filed by RICHARD W. ROSE ; USCA Case Number 19-5191. (Attachments: #1 USCA Order)(zrdj)
February 20, 2020 Partial Filing Fee Received from RICHARD W. ROSE in the amount of $13.23, receipt number: 4616102475. (zrdj)
December 6, 2019 Filing 33 MANDATE of USCA as to #27 Notice of Appeal filed by RICHARD W. ROSE ; USCA Case Number 19-5202. (Attachments: #1 USCA Order)(zrdj)
July 30, 2019 Filing 32 Supplemental Record on Appeal transmitted to US Court of Appeals re Order on Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis; USCA Case Number 19-5202. (jf)
July 26, 2019 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER granting #28 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 7/26/19.(ah)
July 23, 2019 Filing 31 LEAVE TO FILE DENIED- Plaintiff's Motion of Appointment of Counsel; This document is unavailable as the Court denied its filing. "Leave to file DENIED. Case Dismissed 4/15/19. This court lacks jurisdiction to appoint appellate counsel." Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 7/23/19. (ztd)
July 23, 2019 Filing 30 LEAVE TO FILE DENIED- Plaintiff's Motion to Withdraw Motion to Objection to Government Failure to Release History/Information of Requested History of Firearm This document is unavailable as the Court denied its filing. "Leave to file DENIED. Case Dismissed 4/15/19 and is on Appeal." Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 7/23/19. (ztd)
July 18, 2019 USCA Case Number 19-5202 for #27 Notice of Appeal filed by RICHARD W. ROSE. (zrdj)
July 11, 2019 Filing 29 Transmission of the Notice of Appeal, Order Appealed (Memorandum Opinion), and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals. Motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis has been filed. Another transmission will be forwarded when the motion has been decided re #27 Notice of Appeal. (ztd)
July 8, 2019 Filing 28 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis by RICHARD W. ROSE (ztd)
July 8, 2019 Filing 27 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #19 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, #20 Memorandum & Opinion by RICHARD W. ROSE. Fee Status: IFP Pending. Parties have been notified. (ztd)
June 27, 2019 USCA Case Number 19-5191 for #23 Notice of Appeal filed by RICHARD W. ROSE. (zrdj)
June 24, 2019 Filing 25 Supplemental Record on Appeal transmitted to US Court of Appeals re #22 Order on Motion to Stay, Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File ; (ztd)
June 24, 2019 Filing 24 Transmission of the Notice of Appeal, Order Appealed (Memorandum Opinion), and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals. The fee remains to be paid and another notice will be transmitted when the fee has been paid in the District Court re #23 Notice of Appeal. (ztd)
June 21, 2019 Filing 23 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #19 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, #20 Memorandum & Opinion by RICHARD W. ROSE. Fee Status: No Fee Paid. Parties have been notified. (ztd) .
June 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER denying #21 Plaintiff's Motion to Stay Appeal; directing the Clerk to docket the motion separately as Plaintiff's notice of appeal (see document for details). Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 6/21/19.(ah)
May 16, 2019 Filing 21 MOTION to Stay, MOTION for Extension of Time to File by RICHARD W. ROSE (ztd)
April 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MEMORANDUM OPINION accompanying final order issued separately this day. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 4/15/19.(ah)
April 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER granting #10 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and entering judgment for the Defendant, for the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion issued separately this day. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 4/15/19.(ah)
February 22, 2019 Filing 18 SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM to re #14 Response to motion filed by RICHARD W. ROSE. (ztd)
February 15, 2019 Filing 17 REPLY to opposition to motion re #10 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Supporting Memorandum filed by U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. (Sroka, Scott)
February 1, 2019 Filing 16 NOTICE of Restored Government Funding by U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE re Order on Motion to Stay,,, Order on Motion for Extension of Time to,, (Sroka, Scott)
February 1, 2019 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER: In view of Defendant's Notice of Restored Government Funding, the previously imposed stay is lifted. Defendant shall file its reply in further support of its motion for summary judgment on or before February 15, 2019. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 2/1/19.(ah)
January 17, 2019 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER: Granting #15 Motion to Stay; Granting #15 Motion for Extension of Deadlines. This action is hereby STAYED until appropriations are restored to the Department of Justice. Within SEVEN days after funding has been restored, Defendant's counsel shall a file notice with the court, indicating the date upon which funding was restored. Defendant's deadline to file a reply in support of its motion for summary judgment is hereby extended until 21 days after appropriations are restored to the Department of Justice. The Clerk of the Court shall mail a copy of this order to the Plaintiff at his address of record. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 1/17/19. (DJS)
January 11, 2019 Filing 15 MOTION to Stay , MOTION for Extension of Time to in Light of Lapse of Appropriations by U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Hudak, Brian)
January 3, 2019 Filing 14 RESPONSE re #10 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Supporting Memorandum filed by RICHARD W. ROSE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(ztd)
December 4, 2018 Set/Reset Deadlines: Response to Motion for Summary Judgment due by 1/11/2019. (tb)
December 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Order advising the plaintiff to respond by January 11, 2019, to defendant's summary judgment motion or risk entry of judgment in the defendant's favor and dismissal of the case (see document for details). Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 12/3/18.(ah)
November 21, 2018 Filing 10 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Supporting Memorandum by U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (Attachments: #1 Statement of Facts and Proposed Order, #2 Declaration of Adam C. Siple)(Sroka, Scott)
November 14, 2018 Filing 9 Mail Returned as Undeliverable; Order #8 was returned as undeliverable, I spoke the Prison Control Unit of the Marshal Service on 11/13/18 and they indicated that the defendant is being transported to a facility in Jacksonville, Florida as he final station and that he would not be returning to the facility in Jessup, Georgia, therefore there's no new address to send it to at this time. (tb)
October 29, 2018 Filing 8 Mail Returned as Undeliverable; Sent to RICHARD W. ROSE; Type of Document Returned: #4 Order. (zsb)
October 23, 2018 Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 10/22/2018. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 11/21/2018.), RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 10/22/18., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE served on 10/22/2018 (ztd)
October 23, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Scott Leeson Sroka on behalf of All Defendants (Sroka, Scott)
October 22, 2018 Filing 5 SUMMONS (3) Issued as to U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (zrdj)
October 16, 2018 Case Reassigned to Judge Tanya S. Chutkan. Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (zrdj)
October 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER directing an initial partial filing fee in the amount of $18.97 from Prison Account of RICHARD W. ROSE and granting MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (see order for full details). Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on 10/12/2018. (zrdj)
September 20, 2018 Filing 3 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT for period of six months by RICHARD W. ROSE (sb)
September 20, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by RICHARD W. ROSE (sb)
September 20, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE with Jury Demand filed by RICHARD W. ROSE. (Attachment: #1 Supplement)(sb)
September 20, 2018 Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 09/20/2018. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (sb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ROSE v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RICHARD W. ROSE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Represented By: Scott Leeson Sroka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?