URQUHART-BRADLEY v. CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD, INC.
| NICOLE URQUHART-BRADLEY |
| CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD, INC. |
| 1:2018cv02213 |
| September 25, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Royce C Lamberth |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD, INC. (Maffeo, Leslie) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint by CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD, INC..(Maffeo, Leslie) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Change of Address by David W. Sanford (Sanford, David) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Karla Grossenbacher on behalf of CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD, INC. (Grossenbacher, Karla) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Melinda Koster, :Firm- Sanford Heisler Sharp, LLP, :Address- 1350 Avenue of the Americas, 31st Floor, New York, NY 10019. Phone No. - (646) 4025669. Fax No. - (646) 402-5651 Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0090-5761206. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by NICOLE URQUHART-BRADLEY (Attachments: #1 Declaration Exhibit A)(Sanford, David) |
| Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD, INC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Maffeo, Leslie) |
| Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD, INC. served on 10/9/2018, answer due 10/30/2018 (Sanford, David) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD, INC. (jf) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE re #1 Complaint filed by NICOLE URQUHART-BRADLEY. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by NICOLE URQUHART-BRADLEY.(Sanford, David) |
| SUMMONS Not Issued as to CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD, INC. (zrdj) |
| Filing 2 ERRATA Amended Complaint Caption Page by NICOLE URQUHART-BRADLEY #1 Complaint, filed by NICOLE URQUHART-BRADLEY. (Attachments: #1 Errata Amended Caption Page)(Sanford, David) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Royce C. Lamberth. (zrdj) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD, INC. with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-5703681) filed by NICOLE URQUHART-BRADLEY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sanford, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: URQUHART-BRADLEY v. CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: NICOLE URQUHART-BRADLEY | |
| Represented By: | David W. Sanford |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Leslie V. Maffeo |
| Represented By: | Karla Grossenbacher |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
