HILL v. ADMINISTRATIVE CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES
ANDREW HILL |
ADMINISTRATIVE CONFERENCE and ADMINISTRATIVE CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES |
1:2018cv02255 |
September 28, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Colleen Kollar-Kotelly |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Plaintiff's Response to #4 due by 11/23/2018. (dot) |
Filing 5 Order advising plaintiff to respond by November 23, 2018, to defendant's motion to dismiss or risk dismissal of the case based solely on the defendant's arguments (see document for details). Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 10/17/18.(ah) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss by ADMINISTRATIVE CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kolsky, Joshua) |
Filing 3 ORDER ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 10/4/2018. (DM) |
Filing 2 NOTICE to Party re #1 Notice of Removal. (zmd) |
Case Assigned to Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly. (zmd) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of the District of Columbia, case number 2018 SC3 007462 filed by ADMINISTRATIVE CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kolsky, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.