FRASER v. CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A
| Gaby Fraser |
| Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. and CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A |
| 1:2018cv02290 |
| October 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Thomas F Hogan |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
MINUTE ORDER granting #4 Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.'s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading until December 17, 2018. Signed by Judge Thomas F. Hogan on November 30, 2018. (lctfh3)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Responses due by 12/17/2018 (tj) |
| Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Complaint of Gary Fraser by CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Holt, James) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE by GABY FRASER. CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A waiver sent on 10/4/2018, answer due 12/3/2018. (Ash-Shakoor, Anitra) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zrdj) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Thomas F. Hogan. (zsb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-5718650) filed by Gaby Fraser. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Ash-Shakoor, Anitra) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
