HUNT v. MILLER et al
| WILLIAM E. HUNT |
| ALICE P. MILLER, DIONNA M. LEWIS, MICHAEL D. GILL and D. MICHAEL BENNET |
| 1:2018cv02341 |
| October 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 RESPONSE TO ORDER OF THE COURT re #4 ORDER directing the plaintiff to provide the full address of defendant(s), filed by WILLIAM E. HUNT. (zrdj) |
Filing 4
ORDER that plaintiffs motion to proceed informa pauperis #2 is GRANTED, plaintiffs motion for emergency hearing 3 is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and directing the plaintiff within 30 days from the filing date of this Order to provide the full address of defendant(s) or failure to comply may cause the dismissal of the case against the defendant. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 11/16/2018. (zrdj)
|
| Filing 3 EMERGENCY MOTION for Hearing by WILLIAM E. HUNT (See docket entry #1 )(zrdj) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by WILLIAM E. HUNT (zrdj) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against D. MICHAEL BENNET, MICHAEL D. GILL, DIONNA M. LEWIS, ALICE P. MILLER filed by WILLIAM E. HUNT.(zrdj) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 10/10/2018. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zrdj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
