CARZOLI et al v. RFE/RL, INC.
Mr. CHRISTOPHER CARZOLI, Mr. DONALD MAY, Mr. MANFRED HANSPETER, MANFRED HANSPETER, CHRISTOPHER CARZOLI and DONALD MAY |
RFE/RL, INC. |
1:2018cv02368 |
October 12, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Ketanji Brown Jackson |
False Claims Act |
31 U.S.C. ยง 3730 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 GENERAL ORDER AND GUIDELINES FOR CIVIL CASES BEFORE JUDGE KETANJI BROWN JACKSON. The Court will hold the parties and counsel responsible for following these directives, and parties and counsel should pay particular attention to the Courts instructions for briefing motions and filing exhibits. Failure to adhere to this Order may, when appropriate, result the imposition of sanctions and/or sua sponte denial of non-conforming motions. Signed by Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on 12/5/2018. (lckbj1) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to RFE/RL, INC.. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zsb) |
Case Assigned to Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson. (zsb) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by CHRISTOPHER CARZOLI. Case related to Case No. 17-cv-02183-KBJ. (zsb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-5736771) filed by CHRISTOPHER CARZOLI, DONALD MAY, MANFRED HANSPETER. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Supplement Notice of Related Case)(Cohen, Cori) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.