ARPAIO v. COTTLE et al
Plaintiff: Joseph Michael Arpaio
Defendant: Michelle Cottle, The New York Times and NEW YORK TIMES
Case Number: 1:2018cv02387
Filed: October 16, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Amit P Mehta
Nature of Suit: Assault Libel & Slander
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 4, 2018 Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer due by 1/10/2019. (zjd)
December 4, 2018 Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by MICHELLE COTTLE, NEW YORK TIMES (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Brown, Jay)
December 4, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Dana R. Green on behalf of MICHELLE COTTLE, NEW YORK TIMES (Green, Dana)
December 4, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Chad R. Bowman on behalf of MICHELLE COTTLE, NEW YORK TIMES (Bowman, Chad)
December 4, 2018 Filing 4 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by NEW YORK TIMES (Brown, Jay)
December 4, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Jay Ward Brown on behalf of MICHELLE COTTLE, NEW YORK TIMES (Brown, Jay)
December 4, 2018 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER granting Defendants' #7 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. Defendants shall file their Answer or initial responsive pleading in this matter on or before January 10, 2019. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 12/04/2018. (lcapm1) Modified on 12/6/2018 (zjd).
October 22, 2018 Filing 2 SUMMONS (2) Issued Electronically as to MICHELLE COTTLE, NEW YORK TIMES. (Attachments: #1 Summons 2nd, #2 Notice and Consent)(zmd)
October 19, 2018 Case Assigned to Judge Amit P. Mehta. (zmd)
October 16, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ALL DEFENDANTS with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-5742334) filed by JOSEPH MICHAEL ARPAIO. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Klayman, Larry)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ARPAIO v. COTTLE et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Michael Arpaio
Represented By: Larry E. Klayman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michelle Cottle
Represented By: Jay Ward Brown
Represented By: Dana R. Green
Represented By: Chad R. Bowman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The New York Times
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NEW YORK TIMES
Represented By: Jay Ward Brown
Represented By: Dana R. Green
Represented By: Chad R. Bowman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?