HARVEY v. BERRYHILL
| JANET HARVEY |
| NANCY A. BERRYHILL |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| 1:2018cv02574 |
| November 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Reggie B Walton |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XV1 |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Case Reassigned to Judge Reggie B. Walton. Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (zmd)
|
|
Filing 6
FIAT ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. "Leave to file without prepayment of costs GRANTED." Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 12/3/2018. (zmd)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Appearance by Curt D. Campbell, Jr on behalf of JANET HARVEY (Attachments: #1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO LCvR 83.2(g))(zrdj)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan Heuer Levy on behalf of JANET HARVEY (zrdj)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer F. Mezey on behalf of JANET HARVEY (Attachments: #1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO LCvR 83.2(g))(zrdj)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by JANET HARVEY (zrdj)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against NANCY A. BERRYHILL filed by JANET HARVEY.(zrdj)
|
|
Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 11/9/2018. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zrdj)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
