SHAPIRO v. HOWARD UNIVERSITY et al
DANIELLE SHAPIRO |
HOWARD UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL and HOWARD UNIVERSITY |
1:2018cv02588 |
November 9, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Tanya S Chutkan |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER: Advising pro se Plaintiff of her obligation to follow the FRCP, Local Rules and orders of the court. Failure to adhere to these rules or orders may result in sanctions, up to and including dismissal of this action. The Clerk of the Court shall mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff at her address of records. (See order for further details) Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 12/1/318. (DJS) |
Filing 4 Summons (2) Issued as to HOWARD UNIVERSITY, HOWARD UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL. (zsb) |
Filing 3 FIAT ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. "Leave to file without prepayment of costs GRANTED." Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 12/03/2018. (zsb) |
Case Assigned to Judge Tanya S. Chutkan. (zsb) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by DANIELLE SHAPIRO (zsb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against HOWARD UNIVERSITY, HOWARD UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL with Jury Demand filed by DANIELLE SHAPIRO. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit)(zsb) |
Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 11/09/2018. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zsb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.