DASTAN et al v. WHITAKER et al
| Ahmet Dastan and Feride Dastan |
| MICHAEL R. POMPEO, LYNNE P. SKEIRIK, MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Ian C. Kelly, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY and L. FRANCIS CISSNA |
| 1:2018cv02605 |
| November 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| John D Bates |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by AHMET DASTAN, FERIDE DASTAN (Kuck, Charles) Modified event title on 1/9/2019 (znmw). |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS (8) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zef, ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge John D. Bates. (zef, ) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE re #1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus, filed by Feride Dastan, Ahmet Dastan. Related document: #1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus, filed by Feride Dastan, Ahmet Dastan. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons)(Kuck, Charles) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against ALL DEFENDANTS ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-5787063) filed by Feride Dastan, Ahmet Dastan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit)(Kuck, Charles) (Attachment 1 replaced on 11/15/2018) (zef, ). Modified on 11/15/2018 (zef, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
