ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE et al
ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE |
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE, PAUL KIECKER and SONNY PERDUE |
1:2018cv02621 |
November 14, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
John D Bates |
Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
05 U.S.C. ยง 551 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE, PAUL KIECKER, SONNY PERDUE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zrdj) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Michelle B Nowlin on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Nowlin, Michelle) |
Case Assigned to Judge John D. Bates. (zrdj) |
Filing 3 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE (Arata, Shannon) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Fee Status:Filing Fee Waived) filed by ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Exhibit)(Arata, Shannon) |
Filing 1 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE filed by ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Arata, Shannon) |
Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number: 4616095438. (zrdj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.