BENT v. UNNAMED CAPITOL POLICE ONE et al
| MICHAEL S. BENT |
| UNNAMED CAPITOL POLICE TWO, UNNAMED CAPITOL POLICE ONE, GIOVANNI and JOHN MCCULLOUGH |
| 1:2018cv02636 |
| November 15, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Randolph D Moss |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. GIOVANNI served on 11/16/2018; JOHN MCCULLOUGH served on 11/16/2018 (ztd) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Mailing of Summons and Complaint by GIOVANNI, JOHN MCCULLOUGH. (ztd). Modified text on 12/18/2018 (znmw). |
| Filing 6 Summons (2) Issued as to GIOVANNI, JOHN MCCULLOUGH. (ztd) |
Filing 2
STANDING ORDER: The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives set forth in the attached Standing Order. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 11/19/2018. (lcrdm2, )
|
| Filing 3 ENTERED IN ERROR.....SUMMONS (1) Issued as to U.S. Attorney General (ztd). Modified on 12/18/2018 (znmw). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UNNAMED CAPITOL POLICE ONE, UNNAMED CAPITOL POLICE TWO ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 4616095493) filed by MICHAEL S. BENT. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration)(ztd) |
| SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to U.S. Attorney (ztd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
