GAPONTSEV et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY et al
| DR. VALENTIN GAPONTSEV, IPG PHOTONICS CORPORATION and VALENTIN GAPONTSEV |
| THE HONORABLE STEVEN MNUCHIN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and STEVEN MNUCHIN |
| 1:2018cv02826 |
| December 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Rudolph Contreras |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Restoration of Appropriations by STEVEN MNUCHIN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY (Lee, Jason) |
MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part #5 Defendants' Motion to Stay Deadline. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendants shall respond to Plaintiffs' complaint on or before February 19, 2019. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on January 25, 2019. (lcrc3)
|
| Filing 10 Memorandum in opposition to re #5 MOTION to Stay Deadline to Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint in Light of Lapse of Appropriations filed by VALENTIN GAPONTSEV, IPG PHOTONICS CORPORATION. (Edney, Michael) |
| Filing 9 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 12/7/2018. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 2/5/2019. (Edney, Michael); Modified on 1/15/2019 at the request of counsel (tth). |
| Filing 8 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 12/12/2018. (Edney, Michael) Modified date of service on 1/14/2019 (znmw). |
| Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. STEVEN MNUCHIN served on 12/12/2018 (Edney, Michael) Modified date of service on 1/14/2019 (znmw). |
| Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY served on 12/12/2018 (Edney, Michael) Modified date of service on 1/14/2019 (znmw). |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Stay Deadline to Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint in Light of Lapse of Appropriations by STEVEN MNUCHIN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Lee, Jason) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to STEVEN MNUCHIN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent) (zmd) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Rudolph Contreras. (zmd) |
| Filing 3 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by VALENTIN GAPONTSEV, IPG PHOTONICS CORPORATION (McNabb, Stephen) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephen M. McNabb on behalf of VALENTIN GAPONTSEV, IPG PHOTONICS CORPORATION (McNabb, Stephen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief against STEVEN MNUCHIN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-5819946) filed by VALENTIN GAPONTSEV, IPG PHOTONICS CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons to United States Department of the Treasury, #3 Summons to The Honorable Steven Mnuchin, #4 Summons to United States Attorney General, #5 Summons United States Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia, #6 Summons to United States Attorney General, #7 Summons United States Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia)(Edney, Michael) (Attachment 1 replaced on 12/4/2018) (zmd). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
