MAHOBIA et al v. ACOSTA et al
AMIT THAWAIT and VANI MAHOBIA |
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, BOARD OF ALIEN LABOR CERTIFICATION APPEALS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
1:2018cv02892 |
December 10, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Rosemary M Collyer |
Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
05 U.S.C. ยง 0706 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, BOARD OF ALIEN LABOR CERTIFICATION APPEALS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zef, ) |
Case Assigned to Judge Rosemary M. Collyer. (zef, ) |
Filing 2 ERRATA Correcting Caption By Adding Addresses by VANI MAHOBIA, AMIT THAWAIT #1 Complaint,, filed by VANI MAHOBIA, AMIT THAWAIT. (Attachments: #1 Errata Corrected caption)(Isaacson, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-5831574) filed by VANI MAHOBIA, AMIT THAWAIT. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Initial Denial Decision by Certifying Officer, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Certifying Officer's Denial on Reconsideration, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C - BALCA Decision Upholding Denial, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D - Form ETA-9089 Application for Permanent Employment Certification, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Summons Summons - R. Alexander Acosta, #7 Summons Summons - Board of Alien Labor Certification Appeals, #8 Summons Summons - United States)(Isaacson, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.