DAMRAUER v. SPENCER
Plaintiff: SCOTT D. DAMRAUER
Defendant: RICHARD V. SPENCER
Case Number: 1:2018cv02950
Filed: December 14, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Dabney L Friedrich
Nature of Suit: Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 551
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 15, 2019 Filing 9 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General January 15, 2019. (Ramos, Nicholas)
January 9, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy L. McHugh on behalf of SCOTT D. DAMRAUER (McHugh, Timothy)
January 8, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Benjamin C. Ackerly on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Ackerly, Benjamin)
December 31, 2018 Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 12/27/2018. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 2/25/2019. (Ramos, Nicholas)
December 31, 2018 Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 12/26/2018. (Ramos, Nicholas)
December 31, 2018 Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. RICHARD V. SPENCER served on 12/26/2018 (Ramos, Nicholas)
December 26, 2018 Filing fee received in the amount of $ 100.00, receipt number: 4616096036 re #2 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (zrdj)
December 19, 2018 Filing 3 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to RICHARD V. SPENCER, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zsb)
December 19, 2018 Case Assigned to Judge Dabney L. Friedrich. (zsb)
December 19, 2018 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER granting the plaintiffs #2 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Benjamin C. Ackerly may enter an appearance pro hac vice for the purpose of representing the plaintiff in this action. Signed by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on December 19, 2018. (lcdlf1)
December 14, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Benjamin C. Ackerly, :Firm- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, :Address- 951 E. Byrd Street, Richmond, VA 23219. Phone No. - 804-788-8200. Fee Status: No Fee Paid. by SCOTT D. DAMRAUER (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Ramos, Nicholas)
December 14, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-5840771) filed by SCOTT D. DAMRAUER. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons)(Ramos, Nicholas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DAMRAUER v. SPENCER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SCOTT D. DAMRAUER
Represented By: Nicholas Alexander Ramos
Represented By: Benjamin C. Ackerly
Represented By: Timothy L. McHugh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RICHARD V. SPENCER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?