JOHNSON-RICHARDSON v. UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX et al
Case Number: 1:2018cv03016
Filed: February 4, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 38 MEMORANDUM OPINION: For the reasons explained in the attached memorandum opinion, the Court will GRANT Defendants' motion to dismiss and will DISMISS the case without prejudice, pursuant to Rule 4(m). A separate order will issue. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 12/11/2020. (lcrdm2)
February 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 26 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons explained in this Memorandum Opinion and Order, Defendants' motion to dismiss, Dkt. 18, is hereby DENIED. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff shall effect service in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4, and shall file proof of service with the Court, on or before March 20, 2020. Plaintiff is cautioned that, if he fails to do so and fails to demonstrate that there is good cause for the Court to extend the time for him to effect service for an appropriate period, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m). Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 02/02/2020. (lcrdm2, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: JOHNSON-RICHARDSON v. UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?