BATES et al v. STATE OF OHIO et al
MAURA M. ROLL, MISTY C. BRICKLES, R. LOTUS JUSTICE, RACHAEL N. PARKS and CLAYTON M. BATES |
ANNEKA P. COLLINS, JULIE A. HORNE, CLERK OF COURT, R. GUY COLE, JR., LEE D. KOOGLER, MOLLY BECK, UNITED STATES TREASURY, DIANE P. WOOD, GINO J. AGNELLO, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS JUVENILE & PROBATE DIVISION, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES COURTS, RICHARD M. DEWINE, DEBORAH S. HUNT, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT and STATE OF OHIO |
1:2018mc00086 |
July 2, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Washington, DC Office |
88888 |
Timothy J Kelly |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 LARGE ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENT(S) by CLAYTON M. BATES, MISTY C. BRICKLES, R. LOTUS JUSTICE, RACHAEL N. PARKS, MAURA M. ROLL #1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed by MISTY C. BRICKLES, CLAYTON M. BATES, RACHAEL N. PARKS, R. LOTUS JUSTICE, MAURA M. ROLL. (Attachments: #1 part 2, #2 part 3(zrdj) |
Filing 3 NOTICE by CLAYTON M. BATES, RACHAEL N. PARKS (zrdj) |
Filing 2 MOTION for CM/ECF Password by CLAYTON M. BATES, RACHAEL N. PARKS (zrdj) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus ( Filing fee $ 47 receipt number 4616093258.) filed by MAURA M. ROLL, CLAYTON M. BATES, RACHAEL N. PARKS, MISTY C. BRICKLES, R. LOTUS JUSTICE.(zrdj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.