NONPARTY SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM et al v. KOKO'S CONFECTIONARY & NOVELTY
| TOPS COMPANY INC |
| KOKO'S CONFECTIONARY & NOVELTY |
| MAURICE U. CAHN and CAHN & SAMUELS LLP |
| NONPARTY SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM |
| 1:2018mc00094 |
| July 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 11001 |
| Trevor N McFadden |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| Civil Miscellaneous Case |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE by MAURICE U. CAHN, CAHN & SAMUELS LLP (Samuels, Frederick) |
MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to the conference call held today, the Non-Party Petitioner is hereby ORDERED to file notice with the court on or before September 6, 2018. This notice shall indicate whether Non-Party Petitioner consents to a transfer of its #1 Motion to Quash under Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 45. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 8/30/2018. (lctnm3)
|
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Trevor N. McFadden: Telephone Conference held on 8/30/2018. Non-Party Petitioner's notice due by 9/6/2018. (Court Reporter: Patricia Kaneshiro-Miller.) (hmc) |
| Set/Reset Hearings: Telephone Conference set for 8/30/2018, at 3:00 PM in Chambers before Judge Trevor N. McFadden. (hmc) |
|
MINUTE ORDER setting a telephone conference for August 30, 2018, at 3:00 P.M. Eastern Standard Time in Chambers before Judge Trevor N. McFadden. Dial-in information has been emailed to counsel. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 8/28/2018. (lctnm2)
|
| Filing 14 REPLY to opposition to motion re #7 MOTION to Strike #6 Reply to opposition to Motion, #5 Reply to opposition to Motion, filed by TOPS COMPANY INC. (Ciardullo, Jean-Paul) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Jean-Paul Ciardullo, :Firm- Foley & Lardner LLP, :Address- 555 South Flower Street, Suite 3300, Los Angeles, CA 90071. Phone No. - 213-972-4544. Fax No. - 213-972-0065 Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0090-5644087. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by TOPS COMPANY INC (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jean-Paul Ciardullo, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Kapatkin, Brian) |
|
MINUTE ORDER granting the #13 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Counsel Jean-Paul Ciardullo shall promptly register for this Court's CM/ECF system. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 8/16/2018. (lctnm2)
|
| Filing 12 REPLY to opposition to motion re #7 MOTION to Strike #6 Reply to opposition to Motion, #5 Reply to opposition to Motion, filed by TOPS COMPANY INC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jean-Paul Ciardullo)(Kapatkin, Brian) |
| Filing 11 Memorandum in opposition to re #7 MOTION to Strike #6 Reply to opposition to Motion, #5 Reply to opposition to Motion, filed by KOKO'S CONFECTIONARY & NOVELTY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Levitt, David) |
| Filing 10 Memorandum in opposition to re #7 MOTION to Strike #6 Reply to opposition to Motion, #5 Reply to opposition to Motion, filed by MAURICE U. CAHN, CAHN & SAMUELS LLP. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Maurice U. Cahn, #2 Exhibit A)(Samuels, Frederick) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- David H. Levitt, :Firm- Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, :Address- 151 N. Franklin St., Suite 2500. Phone No. - 312-704-3000. Fax No. - 312-704-3001 Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0090-5635232. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by KOKO'S CONFECTIONARY & NOVELTY (Foster, Nabil) |
|
MINUTE ORDER granting #9 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Counsel David H. Levitt shall promptly register for this Court's CM/ECF system. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 8/13/2018. (lctnm2)
|
| Filing 8 RESPONSE re #4 MOTION to Strike #3 Response to motion Declaration of Jean-Paul Ciardullo filed by TOPS COMPANY INC. (Kapatkin, Brian) Modified on 8/9/2018 to correct docket link/text (jf). |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Strike #6 Reply to opposition to Motion, #5 Reply to opposition to Motion, by TOPS COMPANY INC (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jean-Paul Ciardullo, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Text of Proposed Order)(Kapatkin, Brian) |
| Filing 6 REPLY to opposition to motion re #1 MOTION to Quash filed by MAURICE U. CAHN, CAHN & SAMUELS LLP. (Samuels, Frederick) |
| Filing 5 REPLY to opposition to motion re #1 MOTION to Quash Koko's Response to Topps' Opposition filed by KOKO'S CONFECTIONARY & NOVELTY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Foster, Nabil) Modified link on 8/13/2018 (znmw). |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Strike #3 Response to motion Declaration of Jean-Paul Ciardullo by MAURICE U. CAHN, CAHN & SAMUELS LLP (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Samuels, Frederick) |
| Filing 3 RESPONSE re #1 MOTION to Quash filed by TOPS COMPANY INC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jean-Paul Ciardullo, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Kapatkin, Brian) |
|
Filing 2
STANDING ORDER Establishing Procedures for Cases Before Judge Trevor N. McFadden. The parties are hereby ORDERED to read and comply with the directives in the attached standing order. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 7/20/2018. (lctnm2)
|
| Filing fee received: $ 47.00, receipt number: 4616093645. (tth) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Quash by MAURICE U. CAHN, CAHN & SAMUELS LLP (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5A, #7 Exhibit 5B, #8 Exhibit 5C, #9 Exhibit 5D, #10 Exhibit 5E, #11 Exhibit 5F, #12 Exhibit 5G, #13 Exhibit 5H, #14 Exhibit 5 FNS Declaration, #15 Exhibit 6 MUC Declaration, #16 Exhibit 7, #17 Text of Proposed Order) (tth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
