JONES v. CAMPBELL UNIVERSITY et al
| AMOS N. JONES |
| ROBERT COGSWELL, JOHN BRADLEY CREED, J. RICH LEONARD, CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA, CAMPBELL UNIVERSITY, SUSAN THROWER and TIMOTHY ZINNECKER |
| 1:2018mc00100 |
| July 25, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 11001 |
| Christopher R Cooper |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| Civil Miscellaneous Case |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
OPINION and ORDER granting #2 Defendants' Motion for Sanctions and amending the Court's Order granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss in Case No. 18-cv-321. Signed by Judge Christopher R. Cooper on 09/04/2018. (lccrc1) Modified on 9/4/2018 (zlsj).
|
| Filing 4 REPLY to opposition to motion re #2 MOTION for Sanctions filed by CAMPBELL UNIVERSITY, ROBERT COGSWELL, JOHN BRADLEY CREED, TIMOTHY ZINNECKER. (ztd) |
| Filing 3 Memorandum in opposition to re #2 MOTION for Sanctions filed by AMOS N. JONES. (ztd) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Sanctions by CAMPBELL UNIVERSITY, ROBERT COGSWELL, JOHN BRADLEY CREED, TIMOTHY ZINNECKER (ztd) |
|
Filing 1
ORDER directing opening of miscellaneous case regarding Defendants' Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Judge Christopher R. Cooper on 7/25/2018. (lccrc1) (ztd) (Entered: 07/26/2018)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
