NUTT v. AZAR II
| MICHAEL JOSEPH NUTT |
| ALEX M. AZAR, II |
| 1:2019cv00021 |
| January 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Amit P Mehta |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 791 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MICHAEL JOSEPH NUTT with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-5868326) filed by MICHAEL JOSEPH NUTT. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Vargas, Mary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: NUTT v. AZAR II | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ALEX M. AZAR, II | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MICHAEL JOSEPH NUTT | |
| Represented By: | Mary C. Vargas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
