ADVANCEMENT PROJECT v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
| ADVANCEMENT PROJECT |
| U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY |
| 1:2019cv00052 |
| January 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Rudolph Contreras |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. § 552 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Status Report due by 4/12/2019 (tj)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of #14 the parties' joint status report, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall submit another joint status report updating the Court on the status of Defendants' responses to Plaintiff's requests on or before April 12, 2019. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 3/6/19. (lcrc1)
|
|
Filing 14
Joint STATUS REPORT by U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT. (Walker, Johnny)
|
|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Proposed Briefing Schedule due by 3/7/2019 (tj)
|
|
Filing 13
ANSWER to Complaint by U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT.(Walker, Johnny)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall meet, confer, and jointly submit a proposed briefing schedule by March 7, 2019. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 2/21/19. (lcrc1)
|
|
Filing 12
RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES served on 1/22/2019 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Jimenez, Losmin) (Main Document 12 replaced on 1/28/2019) (ztth).
|
|
Filing 11
RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY served on 1/22/2019 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Jimenez, Losmin) (Main Document 11 replaced on 1/28/2019) (ztth).
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Appearance by Johnny Hillary Walker, III on behalf of All Defendants (Walker, Johnny)
|
|
Filing 9
RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE served on 1/22/2019 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Jimenez, Losmin) (Main Document 9 replaced on 1/28/2019) (ztth).
|
|
Filing 8
RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT served on 1/22/2019 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Jimenez, Losmin) (Main Document 8 replaced on 1/28/2019) (ztth).
|
|
Filing 7
RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 1/22/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Jimenez, Losmin) (Main Document 7 replaced on 1/28/2019) (ztth).
|
|
Filing 6
RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 1/22/2019. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 2/21/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Jimenez, Losmin) (Main Document 6 replaced on 1/28/2019) (ztth).
|
|
MINUTE ORDER denying #2 , #3 Motions for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice: The Court notes that Jessica Alcantara and Jennifer Yeu-Jeng Lai-Peterson maintain an office within the District of Columbia. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.2(c)(2) ("Practice by Non-Members of the Bar of this Court"), "[a]n attorney who engages in the practice of law from an office located in the District of Columbia must be a member of... the Bar of this Court to file papers in this Court." Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that the #2 , #3 Motions for Admission Pro Hac Vice are DENIED. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 1/11/19. (lcrc1)
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS (6) Issued Electronically as to U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zef, )
|
|
Filing 4
ERRATA by ADVANCEMENT PROJECT. (Attachments: #1 Complaint)(Jimenez, Losmin)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Jennifer Yeu-Jeng Lai-Peterson, :Firm- Advancement Project, :Address- 1220 L Street, NW, Suite 850, Washington, DC 20005. Phone No. - 202-728-9557. Fax No. - 202-728-9558 Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0090-5881690. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by ADVANCEMENT PROJECT (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Jimenez, Losmin)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Jessica Alcantara, :Firm- Advancement Project, :Address- 1220 L Street, NW, Suite 850, Washington, DC 20005. Phone No. - 202-728-9557. Fax No. - 202-728-9558 Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0090-5881663. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by ADVANCEMENT PROJECT (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Jimenez, Losmin)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-5881453) filed by ADVANCEMENT PROJECT. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons DHS, #3 Summons Summons ICE, #4 Summons Summons State Dept., #5 Summons Summons US AG, #6 Summons Summons US Attorney DC, #7 Summons Summons USCIS)(Jimenez, Losmin) (Attachment 1 replaced on 1/10/2019) (zef, ).
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Rudolph Contreras. (zef, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
