STEWARD v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
| WILLIAM STEWARD |
| NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK) |
| 1:2019cv00280 |
| February 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Richard J Leon |
| Federal Employer's Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 2 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard J. Leon on 3/20/19. (lcrjl3)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph John Bottiglieri on behalf of NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK) (Bottiglieri, Joseph) |
| Filing 7 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement of National Railroad Passenger Corporation by NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK) (Engel, Jason) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation's Answer and Affirmative Defenses and Jury Demand by NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK).(Engel, Jason) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Jason R. Engel on behalf of NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK) (Engel, Jason) |
| NOTICE OF CORRECTED DOCKET ENTRY: Document No. re #3 Summons Returned Executed as to Federal Defendant, was entered in error and will be refiled by the Clerk's Office under the correct event.(jf) |
| Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK) served on 2/6/2019, answer due 2/27/2019 (jf) |
| Filing 3 ENTERED IN ERROR.....RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK) served on 2/6/2019 (Duckworth, James) Modified to correct date served from 2/5 to 2/6 on 2/7/2019 (ztd). Modified on 2/11/2019 (jf). |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK). (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zef, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK) with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-5922693) filed by WILLIAM STEWARD. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Duckworth, James) (Attachment 1 replaced on 2/1/2019) (zef, ). |
| Case Assigned to Judge Richard J. Leon. (zef) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: STEWARD v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK) | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: WILLIAM STEWARD | |
| Represented By: | James M. Duckworth |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK) | |
| Represented By: | Jason R. Engel |
| Represented By: | Joseph John Bottiglieri |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
