AL SAWMAHI v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
| MOHAMMED H. AL SAWMAHI |
| U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES, DESHAWNA WILLIAMS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CHRISTOPHER WRAY, MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN and L. FRANCIS CISSNA |
| 1:2019cv00303 |
| February 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Rosemary M Collyer |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Diana Viggiano Valdivia on behalf of All Defendants (Valdivia, Diana) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (8) Issued Electronically as to L. FRANCIS CISSNA, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, DESHAWNA WILLIAMS, CHRISTOPHER WRAY, and U.S. Attorney. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zef, ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Rosemary M. Collyer. (zef, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-5929868) filed by MOHAMMED H. AL SAWMAHI. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hacking, James) (Attachment 9 replaced on 2/6/2019) (zef, ). Modified event title on 2/7/2019 (znmw). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
