GUNTER v. UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE
| PAUL GUNTER |
| UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE |
| ALEX M. AZAR, II and Robert J. Tomlinson, M.D. |
| 1:2019cv00353 |
| February 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Thomas F Hogan |
| Prisoner Petition: Civil Rights (Other) |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 3/20/2019., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 3/20/2019. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 4/19/2019.) (jf) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS (3) Issued as to UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (zrdj) |
| Case Reassigned to Judge Thomas F. Hogan. Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (zrdj) |
Filing 4
ORDER directing an initial partial filing fee in the amount of $42.33 from Prison Account of PAUL GUNTER and granting #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (see order for full details). Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 2/27/2019. (zrdj)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
