VULUPALA v. WHITAKER et al
| PRITHVI VULUPALA |
| MIKE POMPEO, KATHERINE HADDA, CARL RISCH, MATTHEW WHITAKER, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN and JOHN DOES |
| 1:2019cv00378 |
| February 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Amy Berman Jackson |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 2/19/2019. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 4/20/2019. (Nimer, Jennifer) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (6) Issued Electronically as to KATHERINE HADDA, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, MIKE POMPEO, CARL RISCH, MATTHEW WHITAKER, and U.S. Attorney. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zef, ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Amy Berman Jackson. (zef, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS for Writ of Mandamus and Declaratory and Injunctive Relief against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-5946485) filed by PRITHVI VULUPALA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet CIVIL COVER, #5 Summons HADDA, #6 Summons NIELSEN, #7 Summons POMPEO, #8 Summons RISCH, #9 Summons USAO, #10 Summons WHITAKER)(Nimer, Jennifer) Modified on 2/14/2019 (zef, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
