SEBBAR v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
| AZIZ SEBBAR |
| U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES, MICHAEL R. POMPEO, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. CONSULATE, CASABLANCA, MOROCCO, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, JENNIFER RASAMIMANANA, L. FRANCIS CISSNA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE and U.S. CONSULATE |
| 1:2019cv00757 |
| March 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Colleen Kollar-Kotelly |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 6/21/2019. (lcckk3)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by AZIZ SEBBAR (Hacking, James) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer due by 6/27/2019, if a stipulation of dismissal has not been filed. (dot) |
|
MINUTE ORDER: The Court is in receipt of Defendants' #5 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Complaint is currently due May 28, 2019. Plaintiff's Complaint requests a mandamus compelling Defendants to adjudicate Plaintiff's spouse's visa application. The United States Department of State adjudicated that visa application and issued the visa on May 9, 2019. Defendants believe that this case is now moot. Defendants request a 30-day extension to allow the parties to confer and either stipulate to dismissal or permit Defendants to prepare a dispositive motion of the grounds of mootness. Defendants' Motion is GRANTED nunc pro tunc to May 28, 2019. If a stipulation of dismissal has not been filed, Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Complaint is due JUNE 27, 2019. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 5/29/2019. (lcckk3)
|
| Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by L. FRANCIS CISSNA, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, MICHAEL R. POMPEO, JENNIFER RASAMIMANANA, U.S. CONSULATE, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE (Hair, Christopher) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Charles Hair on behalf of L. FRANCIS CISSNA, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, MICHAEL R. POMPEO, JENNIFER RASAMIMANANA, U.S. CONSULATE, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE (Hair, Christopher) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 3/20/19. (DM)
|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (10) Issued Electronically as to L. FRANCIS CISSNA, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, MICHAEL R. POMPEO, JENNIFER RASAMIMANANA, U.S. CONSULATE, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zef, ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly. (zef, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-6007821) filed by AZIZ SEBBAR. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Summons, #10 Summons, #11 Summons)(Hacking, James) (Attachment 1 replaced on 3/20/2019) (zef, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
