MORLEY v. BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
| JEFFERSON MORLEY |
| BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM |
| 1:2019cv00797 |
| March 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Carl J Nichols |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case directly reassigned to Judge Carl J. Nichols. Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly is no longer assigned to the case. (ztnr) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Joint Status Report due by 8/14/2019, informing the Court on next steps for moving forward. (dot) |
Minute Order: The Court is in receipt of the Defendant's #10 Status Report. Defendant reports that, in reviewing Plaintiff's FOIA request it identified nearly 4,000 pages submitted to the Board by two third parties requesting confidential treatment. The Board now requires time to confer with the third parties to determine whether the requests for confidential treatment are valid. Because the Defendant is conferring with third parties in an effort to determine whether or not the third-party submissions can be released to Plaintiff, the Court finds that Defendant's timeline for issuing a final determination and final response on July 31, 2019 is reasonable. The Court ORDERS the parties to file a Joint Status Report by AUGUST 14, 2019, informing the Court on next steps for moving forward. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 6/7/2019. (lcckk3)
|
| Filing 10 STATUS REPORT by BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM. (Schaefer, Daniel) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Defendant's Status Report due by 6/5/2019, responding to Plaintiff's concerns about the timing of the processing and release of the responsive documents. (dot) |
|
Minute Order: The Court is in receipt of the parties' #9 Joint Status Report. Defendant states that it is currently consulting with two submitters of information to determine and resolve any objections to the release of the potentially confidential information. Defendant indicates that it expects to make a final determination and issue a final response on both submitters' records by July 31, 2019. Plaintiff argues that the delay in obtaining a response from the submitters of the potentially confidential information is unreasonable. Plaintiff requests that the Court require final processing and release of the non-exempt responsive records by the June 30, 2019. Plaintiff explains that due to communication issues, Defendant has not had the opportunity to respond to Plaintiff's specific concerns about timing. The Court ORDERS Defendant to file a short Status Report by JUNE 5, 2019, responding to Plaintiff's concerns about the timing of the processing and release of the responsive documents. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 5-29-2019. (lcckk3)
|
| Filing 9 STATUS REPORT by JEFFERSON MORLEY. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Moss, Bradley) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Meet & Confer Statement due by 5/27/2019. (dot) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 4/29/2019. (lcckk3)
|
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM.(Schaefer, Daniel) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel Patrick Schaefer on behalf of BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM (Schaefer, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 3/29/2019. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 4/28/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit USADC receipt)(Moss, Bradley) |
| Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 4/1/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit USAG receipt)(Moss, Bradley) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 03/27/19. (DM)
|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zef, ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly. (zef, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-6015044) filed by JEFFERSON MORLEY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons USADC, #3 Summons USAG, #4 Summons Fed)(Moss, Bradley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: MORLEY v. BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JEFFERSON MORLEY | |
| Represented By: | Bradley Prescott Moss |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM | |
| Represented By: | Daniel Patrick Schaefer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
