SOUNDEXCHANGE, INC. v. MUSIC CHOICE
SOUNDEXCHANGE, INC. |
MUSIC CHOICE |
1:2019cv00999 |
April 10, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Reggie B Walton |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MINUTE ORDER. Upon consideration of the plaintiff's #10 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time, and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that (1) the plaintiff shall file its opposition to the defendant's motion to transfer on or before July 22, 2019, and (2) the defendant shall file its reply on or before August 5, 2019. Signed by Judge Reggie B. Walton on July 1, 2019. (lcrbw3) |
Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #9 MOTION to Transfer Case by SOUNDEXCHANGE, INC. (Handzo, David) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Transfer Case by MUSIC CHOICE (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Declaration of Paul Fakler, #3 Exhibit 1 to Fakler Declaration, #4 Exhibit 2 to Fakler Declaration, #5 Exhibit 3 to Fakler Declaration, #6 Exhibit 4 to Fakler Declaration, #7 Exhibit 5 to Fakler Declaration, #8 Exhibit 6 to Fakler Declaration, #9 Exhibit 7 to Fakler Declaration, #10 Exhibit 8 to Fakler Declaration, #11 Exhibit 9 to Fakler Declaration, #12 Declaration of David Del Beccaro, #13 Text of Proposed Order)(Fakler, Paul) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by MUSIC CHOICE.(Fakler, Paul) |
Filing 7 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by MUSIC CHOICE (Fakler, Paul) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Diana Szego Fassbender on behalf of MUSIC CHOICE (Fassbender, Diana) |
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE by SOUNDEXCHANGE, INC.. MUSIC CHOICE waiver sent on 4/23/2019, answer due 6/22/2019. (Chapuis, Emily) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Emily Lauren Chapuis on behalf of SOUNDEXCHANGE, INC. (Chapuis, Emily) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to MUSIC CHOICE. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zsb) |
Case Assigned to Judge Reggie B. Walton. (zsb) |
Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by SOUNDEXCHANGE, INC. (Handzo, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MUSIC CHOICE with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-6050688) filed by SOUNDEXCHANGE, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Handzo, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: SOUNDEXCHANGE, INC. v. MUSIC CHOICE | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: MUSIC CHOICE | |
Represented By: | Paul M. Fakler |
Represented By: | Diana Szego Fassbender |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: SOUNDEXCHANGE, INC. | |
Represented By: | David Andrew Handzo |
Represented By: | Emily Lauren Chapuis |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.