HUSSAIN v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
SHABIER HUSSAIN |
EMBASSY OF THE UNITED STATES, ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN, U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, MICHAEL R. POMPEO, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DAVID HALE, L. FRANCIS CISSNA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE |
1:2019cv01022 |
April 12, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Rudolph Contreras |
Other Statutory Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 SUMMONS (9) Issued Electronically as to L. FRANCIS CISSNA, EMBASSY OF THE UNITED STATES, ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN, DAVID HALE, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, MICHAEL R. POMPEO, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, and U.S. Attorney. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zef, ) |
Case Assigned to Judge Rudolph Contreras. (zef, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-6055679) filed by SHABIER HUSSAIN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Summons, #10 Summons)(Hacking, James) (Attachment 1 replaced on 4/15/2019) (zef, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.