GIBSON v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
CHRISTOPHER C. GIBSON |
U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES, MICHAEL R. POMPEO, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, U.S. CONSULATE, BRIDGETOWN, BARBADOS, LINDA SWARTZ TAGLIALATELA and L. FRANCIS CISSNA |
1:2019cv01217 |
April 26, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
John D Bates |
Other Statutory Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs (Hacking, James) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS (10) Issued Electronically as to L. FRANCIS CISSNA, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, MICHAEL R. POMPEO, LINDA SWARTZ TAGLIALATELA, U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. CONSULATE, Bridgetown, Barbados, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zef, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-6083271) filed by CHRISTOPHER C. GIBSON. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Summons, #10 Summons, #11 Summons)(Hacking, James) (Attachment 1 replaced on 4/26/2019) (zef, ). |
Case Assigned to Judge John D. Bates. (zef, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.