BEN OTHMAN et al v. POMPEO et al
ANIS BEN OTHMAN and ALEXANDRA BEN OTHMAN |
CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, MICHAEL R. POMPEO, LOREN K. MILLER, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, CARL C. RISCH, WILLIAM BARR, BROOKE KIDD, L. FRANCIS CISSNA, EDWARD J. RAMOTOWSKI and WILLIAM P. BARR |
1:2019cv01257 |
April 30, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Royce C Lamberth |
Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time. The Court extends the government's time to respond to the complaint through 9/27/2019. Signed by Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 07/02/2019. (lcrcl3) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer due by 9/27/2019 (lsj) |
Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by L. FRANCIS CISSNA, BROOKE KIDD, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, LOREN K. MILLER, MICHAEL R. POMPEO, EDWARD J. RAMOTOWSKI, CARL C. RISCH, CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY (Clark, Denise) |
Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. WILLIAM BARR served on 5/3/2019; L. FRANCIS CISSNA served on 5/2/2019; BROOKE KIDD served on 5/3/2019; KEVIN K. MCALEENAN served on 5/2/2019; LOREN K. MILLER served on 5/2/2019; MICHAEL R. POMPEO served on 5/3/2019; EDWARD J. RAMOTOWSKI served on 5/3/2019; CARL C. RISCH served on 5/3/2019; CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY served on 5/3/2019, RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 05/03/2019., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 5/3/2019. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 7/2/2019.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Anis Ben Othamn et al. V. Pompeo et al- Proof of Service for Kevin Mc Aleenan, #2 Exhibit Anis Ben Othamn et al. V. Pompeo et al- Proof of Service for William Barr, #3 Exhibit Anis Ben Othamn et al. V. Pompeo et al- Proof of Service for Christopher A. Wray, #4 Exhibit Anis Ben Othamn et al. V. Pompeo et al- Proof of Service for Michael Pompeo, #5 Exhibit Anis Ben Othamn et al. V. Pompeo et al- Proof of Service for Jessie K. Liu, #6 Exhibit Anis Ben Othamn et al. V. Pompeo et al- Proof of Service for L. Francis Cissna, #7 Exhibit Anis Ben Othamn et al. V. Pompeo et al- Proof of Service for Loren K. Miller, #8 Exhibit Anis Ben Othamn et al. V. Pompeo et al- Proof of Service for Carl C. Risch, #9 Exhibit Anis Ben Othamn et al. V. Pompeo et al- Proof of Service for Edward J. Ramotowski, #10 Exhibit Anis Ben Othamn et al. V. Pompeo et al- Proof of Service for Brooke Kidd)(Ragland, Thomas) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS (10) Issued Electronically as to WILLIAM BARR, L. FRANCIS CISSNA, BROOKE KIDD, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, LOREN K. MILLER, MICHAEL R. POMPEO, EDWARD J. RAMOTOWSKI, CARL C. RISCH, CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, and U.S. Attorney. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zef, ) |
Case Assigned to Judge Royce C. Lamberth. (zef, ) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against WILLIAM BARR, L. FRANCIS CISSNA, BROOKE KIDD, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, LOREN K. MILLER, MICHAEL R. POMPEO, EDWARD J. RAMOTOWSKI, CARL C. RISCH, CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-6091152) filed by ALEXANDRA BEN OTHMAN, ANIS BEN OTHMAN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Ben Othman et al v. Pompeo et al - Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Ben Othman et al v. Pompeo et al - Proposed Summonses)(Ragland, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.