TEAMSTERS LOCAL 639 -- EMPLOYERS PENSION TRUST et al v. SHEPARD EXPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
ERIC D. WEISS, ANTHONY SMITH, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 639 -- EMPLOYERS HEALTH TRUST, PHILIP GILES, THOMAS E. RATLIFF, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 639 -- EMPLOYERS PENSION TRUST, FORREST HARVEY, JOHN GIBSON, MICHAEL R. BULL, RAYMOND HOWARD and FRANK W. STEGMAN |
SHEPARD EXPOSITION SERVICES, INC. |
1:2019cv01288 |
May 3, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Amy Berman Jackson |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. SHEPARD EXPOSITION SERVICES, INC. served on 5/14/2019, answer due 6/4/2019 (Bardes, Diana) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to SHEPARD EXPOSITION SERVICES, INC. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zef, ) |
Case Assigned to Judge Amy Berman Jackson. (zef, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SHEPARD EXPOSITION SERVICES, INC. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-6100808) filed by RAYMOND HOWARD, MICHAEL R. BULL, JOHN GIBSON, FRANK W. STEGMAN, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 639 -- EMPLOYERS HEALTH TRUST, THOMAS E. RATLIFF, ERIC D. WEISS, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 639 -- EMPLOYERS PENSION TRUST, PHILIP GILES, ANTHONY SMITH, FORREST HARVEY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Summons)(Bardes, Diana) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.