DOE v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
| Matthew Tsun and JANE DOE |
| WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY |
| JANICE L. COLE |
| 1:2019cv01298 |
| May 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Ketanji Brown Jackson |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 REPLY to opposition to motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY. (Cole, Janice) |
| NOTICE OF ERROR re #8 Memorandum in Opposition; emailed to mtsun@simeonemiller.com, cc'd 2 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Incorrect document/case, 2. DO NOT REFILE - for future filings the main pleading is the first page viewed (zjf, ) |
| Filing 8 Memorandum in opposition to re #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by JANE DOE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 - Complaint, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Tsun, Matthew) |
ENTERED IN ERROR.....MINUTE ORDER granting, for good cause shown, #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint on or before 6/6/2019. Signed by Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on 5/28/2019. (lckbj1) Modified on 6/3/2019 (jf).
|
|
MINUTE ORDER granting, for good cause shown, #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Oppose Motion to Dismiss. It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's response to Defendant's #5 Motion to Dismiss is due on or before 6/6/2019. Signed by Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on 5/28/2019. (lckbj1)
|
| Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File an Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss by JANE DOE (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Tsun, Matthew) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support Memo of Law, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order, #3 Exhibit Affidavit of R Pavlik)(Cole, Janice) |
|
Filing 4
GENERAL ORDER AND GUIDELINES FOR CIVIL CASES BEFORE JUDGE KETANJI BROWN JACKSON. The Court will hold the parties and counsel responsible for following these directives, and parties and counsel should pay particular attention to the Courts instructions for briefing motions and filing exhibits. Failure to adhere to this Order may, when appropriate, result the imposition of sanctions and/or sua sponte denial of non-conforming motions. Signed by Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on 5/8/2019. (lckbj1)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Counsel/Party re #2 Errata, #1 Notice of Removal, (zef, ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson. (zef, ) |
| Filing 6 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY. (zef, ) |
| Filing 2 ERRATA for Amended Filing of Pleadings and Other Papers Filed in Superior Court by JANICE L. COLE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Superior Court filing)(Cole, Janice) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from District of Columbia Superior Court, case number 2019CA002185 Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0090-6104109 filed by JANICE L. COLE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #3 Disclosure of Corporate Interest, #4 Superior Court Documents)(Cole, Janice) (Attachment 1 replaced on 5/7/2019) (zef, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
