ALRIDGE v. G4S SECURE SOLUTIONS
| Courtney Aldridge and COURTNEY T. ALRIDGE |
| G4S Secure Solutions and G4 SECURE SOLUTIONS (USA), INC. |
| 1:2019cv01360 |
| May 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| James E Boasberg |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
MEMORANDUM OPINION re #13 Order. Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 7/8/2019. (lcjeb2)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER: The Court ORDERS that: (1) Defendant's #8 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED; and (2) It shall respond to the Complaint by July 22, 2019. Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 7/8/2019. (lcjeb2)
|
| NOTICE OF ERROR re #12 Reply to Document; emailed to william.sherman@dinsmore.com, cc'd 2 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Invalid attorney signature, 2. Please do not refile. In the future, the ECF login and signature must match. (ztth, ) |
| Filing 12 REPLY re #11 Memorandum in Opposition filed by G4 SECURE SOLUTIONS (USA), INC.. (Sherman, William) |
| Filing 11 Memorandum in opposition to #8 MOTION to Dismiss filed by COURTNEY T. ALRIDGE. (Attachment: #1 Exhibits A - C) (tth) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER DIRECTING Plaintiff to Respond to Defendant's #8 Motion to Dismiss on or before June 19, 2019. Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 6/5/2019. (lcjeb2)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Respond by 6/19/2019. (znbn) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Jennifer Pope, :Firm- Dinsmore & Shohl LLP, :Address- 900 Wilshire Drive, Ste. 300. Phone No. - 248-647-6000. Fax No. - 248-647-5210 Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0090-6155408. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by G4 SECURE SOLUTIONS (USA), INC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Sherman, William) |
|
MINUTE ORDER GRANTING #9 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of JENNIFER POPE. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 5/30/2019. (lcjeb2)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss by G4 SECURE SOLUTIONS (USA), INC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Sherman, William) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE as to COURTNEY T. ALRIDGE. Attorney Arinderjit Dhali terminated. (Dhali, Arinderjit) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE to Counsel/Party re #5 Errata, #3 Errata, #1 Notice of Removal. (zef, ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge James E. Boasberg. (zef, ) |
| Filing 5 ERRATA by G4 SECURE SOLUTIONS (USA), INC. #1 Notice of Removal filed by G4 SECURE SOLUTIONS (USA), INC.. (Attachments: #1 Notice to Counsel/Party, #2 Exhibit)(Sherman, William) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by William A. Sherman, II on behalf of All Defendants (Sherman, William) |
| Filing 3 ERRATA attaching Exhibits A and B by G4S Secure Solutions #1 Notice of Removal filed by G4S Secure Solutions. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Sherman, William) |
| Filing 2 ENTERED IN ERROR.....NOTICE of Removal by G4S Secure Solutions re #1 Notice of Removal (Sherman, William) Modified on 5/10/2019 (jf). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of the District of Columbia, case number 19-0002447 Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0090-6116683 filed by G4S Secure Solutions. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sherman, William) |
| NOTICE OF CORRECTED DOCKET ENTRY: Document No. re #2 Notice (Other) was entered in error at the request of counsel and will be refiled. (jf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
