AANOUZ et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
BOUCHRA AANOUZ and U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES |
JENNIFER RASAMIMANA, MICHAEL R. POMPEO, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, L. FRANCIS CISSNA and U.S. CONSULATE |
1:2019cv01475 |
May 21, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Rudolph Contreras |
Other Statutory Actions |
8 U.S.C. ยง 1101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 SUMMONS (10) Issued Electronically as to L. FRANCIS CISSNA, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, MICHAEL R. POMPEO, JENNIFER RASAMIMANA, U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. CONSULATE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zeg) |
Case Assigned to Judge Rudolph Contreras. (zeg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against L. FRANCIS CISSNA, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, MICHAEL R. POMPEO, JENNIFER RASAMIMANA, U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-6135824) filed by BOUCHRA AANOUZ. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Summons, #10 Summons, #11 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hacking, James) (Attachment 11 replaced on 5/23/2019) (zeg). Modified on 5/23/2019 (zeg). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.