BAHRAMPOUR v. DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE et al
| AFSHIN BAHRAMPOUR |
| USSTRATCOM, SENIOR MILITARY OFFICIALS, NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL, UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL, EXECUTIVE BRANCH OFFICIALS, NSA DOMINT, DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, OFFICE OF DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS, JOINT TERRORISM TASKFORCES and DIRECTOR OF THE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY |
| 1:2019cv01491 |
| May 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Prisoner Petition: Civil Rights (Other) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE. Ordered that the #2 application of the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. This is a final appealable Order. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 6/07/2019. (zeg)
|
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 06/07/2019. (zeg) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT for period of six months by AFSHIN BAHRAMPOUR (zsb) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by AFSHIN BAHRAMPOUR (zsb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by AFSHIN BAHRAMPOUR. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit)(zsb) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 05/16/2019. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zsb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
