WARBINGTON v. HARRIS TEETER, INC.
| GARRETT MARCELL WARBINGTON |
| HARRIS TEETER, INC. |
| 1:2019cv01585 |
| May 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Colleen Kollar-Kotelly |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Plaintiff's Response to #7 due by 8/5/2019. (dot) |
Filing 8
Order advising plaintiff to respond by August 5, 2019, to defendant's motion to dismiss or, alternatively, for a more definite statement, or risk dismissal of the case based on defendant's assertions supporting the motion (see document for details). Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 7/1/19.(ah)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss or Alternatively, For a More Definite Statement and Points and Authorities in Support of Motion by HARRIS TEETER, INC. (Hoffman, Joshua). Added MOTION for More Definite Statement on 6/28/2019 (znmw). |
|
Filing 6
ORDER ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 06/10/19. (DM)
|
| Filing 5 ERRATA by HARRIS TEETER, INC. #4 Notice to Counsel/Party. (Hoffman, Joshua) Modified on 6/5/2019 (ztd). Modified to remove "entered in error" on 6/6/2019 (znmw). |
| ENTERED IN ERROR.....NOTICE OF CORRECTED DOCKET ENTRY re #5 Errata. Documents must have the heading,case caption & the body should spell out the basis for the Errata. The corrected doc. is an attachment. (ztd, ) Modified text on 6/5/2019 (ztd). Modified to enter in error on 6/6/2019; please disregard. (znmw). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Counsel/Party re #1 Notice of Removal. (zef, ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly. (zef, ) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Joshua M. Hoffman on behalf of HARRIS TEETER, INC. (Hoffman, Joshua) |
| Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by HARRIS TEETER, INC. (Hoffman, Joshua) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court for the District of Columbia, case number 2019CA2681 Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0090-6153733 filed by HARRIS TEETER, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Superior Court Documents Complaint, #2 Superior Court Documents Initial Order and Addendum, #3 Superior Court Documents Motion to Dismiss, #4 Exhibit SCC Business Entity Details, #5 Superior Court Documents Order, #6 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Hoffman, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: WARBINGTON v. HARRIS TEETER, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: HARRIS TEETER, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Joshua M. Hoffman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: GARRETT MARCELL WARBINGTON | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
