COMBS v. ARAMARK
DIANNA T COMBS and DIANNA T. COMBS |
ARAMARK CAMPUS LLC and ARAMARK |
1:2019cv01614 |
June 3, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Randolph D Moss |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE of Non-Opposition to Motion to Dismiss and Failure to Comply with Court's July 10, 2019 Order by ARAMARK re Order,, #4 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Sharbaugh, Matthew) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Non-Opposition by ARAMARK re #4 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Sharbaugh, Matthew) |
MINUTE ORDER: On June 5, 2019, the Court ordered Plaintiff to respond to to Defendant's motion to dismiss, Dkt. 4, on or before July 3, 2019. See Dkt. 8. That deadline has now passed, and Plaintiff has not responded. It is, accordingly, ORDERED that on or before July 24, 2019, Plaintiff shall inform the Court whether she intends to pursue this case. Failure to comply may result in the Court treating the motion to dismiss as conceded or dismissing this action for failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 7/10/2019. (lcrdm2, ) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Plaintiff shall inform the Court whether she intends to pursue this case by 7/24/2019. (kt) |
Filing 8 FOX/NEAL ORDER: Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, Dkt. 4, on or before July 3, 2019. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 6/5/2019. (lcrdm2, ) |
MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of Anne E. Martinez's motion for leave to appear pro hac vice, Dkt. #6 , the motion is hereby GRANTED. Anne E. Martinez may appear pro hac vice in this case. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 6/5/2019. (lcrdm2, ) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Plaintiff's Response to #4 due by 7/3/2019. (dot) |
Filing 7 STANDING ORDER: The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives set forth in the attached Standing Order. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 6/4/2019. (lcrdm2, ) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Anne E. Martinez, :Firm- Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, :Address- 1701 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103. Phone No. - 215.963.5718. Fax No. - 215.963.5001 Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0090-6164933. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by ARAMARK (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Anne E. Martinez, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Sharbaugh, Matthew) |
Filing 5 NOTICE to Parties. (zjd) |
Case Assigned to Judge Randolph D. Moss. (zjd) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by ARAMARK CAMPUS LLC (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Sharbaugh, Matthew) |
Filing 3 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by ARAMARK CAMPUS LLC (Sharbaugh, Matthew) |
Filing 2 ENTERED IN ERROR.....RULE 26a1 STATEMENT. (Sharbaugh, Matthew) Modified on 6/3/2019 (jf). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court for the District of Columbia, case number 2019 CA 000237 B Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0090-6161002 filed by ARAMARK CAMPUS LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Documents from Superior Court, #3 Declaration of Andrew Unton, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sharbaugh, Matthew) (Attachment 4 replaced on 6/4/2019) (zjd) |
NOTICE OF CORRECTED DOCKET ENTRY: Document No. re #2 Rule 26a1 Statement was entered in error and refile by counsel as to the correct event. (See Docket Entry #3 to view document)(jf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.