LAWRENCE v. MARTINEZ et al
Plaintiff: EILEEN RAYE LAWRENCE
Defendant: ANNETTE L. HAYES, ANDREW C. FRIEDMAN, BRIAN WERNER, RICHARD A. JONES and RICARDO MARTINEZ
Case Number: 1:2019cv01630
Filed: May 30, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Ordered that the application of the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. This is a final appealable Order. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 06/21/2019. (zsb)
June 21, 2019 Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 06/21/2019. (zsb)
June 13, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of Change of Address by EILEEN RAYE LAWRENCE (zrdj)
June 13, 2019 Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT against ANDREW C. FRIEDMAN, ANNETTE L. HAYES, RICHARD A. JONES, RICARDO MARTINEZ, BRIAN WERNER filed by EILEEN RAYE LAWRENCE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(zrdj)
May 30, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by EILEEN RAYE LAWRENCE (zsb)
May 30, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANDREW C. FRIEDMAN, ANNETTE L. HAYES, RICHARD A. JONES, RICARDO MARTINEZ, BRIAN WERNER filed by EILEEN RAYE LAWRENCE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 8, #10 Summons) (zsb)
May 30, 2019 Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 05/30/2019. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zsb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LAWRENCE v. MARTINEZ et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANNETTE L. HAYES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANDREW C. FRIEDMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BRIAN WERNER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RICHARD A. JONES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RICARDO MARTINEZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: EILEEN RAYE LAWRENCE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?